|
|

Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals & Sustainable Development
Executive Summary
Jan 27/03
Return to Mining News List
[from Breaking New Ground:
Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development
The Report of the MMSD Project, published in association with the IIED
and WBCSD]
Mineral products are essential to contemporary societies and economies.
Many basic needs cannot be met without them. But simply meeting market
demand for mineral commodities falls far short of meeting society's expectations
of industry.The process of producing, using, and recycling minerals could
help society reach many other goals - providing jobs directly and indirectly,
aiding in the development of national economies, and helping to reach
energy and resource efficiency targets, among many others.Where industry
is falling far short of meeting these objectives, it is seen as failing
in its obligations and is increasingly unwelcome.
The mining and minerals industry faces some of the most difficult challenges
of any industrial sector - and is currently distrusted by many of the
people it deals with day to day. It has been failing to convince some
of its constituents and stakeholders that it has the 'social licence to
operate' in many parts of the world, based on the many expectations of
its potential contributions:
- Countries expect that minerals development will bean engine of sustained
economic growth.
- Local communities expect that the industry will provide employment,
infrastructure, and other benefits that counter the risks and impacts
they experience and will leave them better off than when the project
started.
- The industry's employees expect safer and healthier working conditions,
a better community life, and consideration when their employment ends.
- Local citizens and human rights campaigners expect companies to respect
and support basic rights, even when they are operating where government
does not.
- Environmental organizations expect a much higher standard of performance
and that the industry will avoid ecologically and culturally sensitive
areas. Investors expect higher returns and have shown considerable concern
about the industry's financial results.
- Consumers expect safe products produced in a manner that meets acceptable
environmental and social standards.
Companies must do much more, sometimes with fewer resources.There are
boundaries to the responsibilities companies can take on in society: most
people would be uncomfortable in a world where companies were the main
sources of education and health care, the principal agencies protecting
individual rights, or surrogate governments. Other actors have important
roles to play - governments above all. Government must provide an enabling
environment, define the standards expected of industry, assure those standards
are being met, and have meaningful incentives and sanctions to encourage
compliance. It must be a better service provider and a better protector
of minority rights.
Success will require improved capacity and performance by all in the
minerals sector - industry at all stages from exploration to processing,
government, international organizations, non-governmental organizations
(NGOs), academia, civil society, communities, labour, lenders, insurers,
and consumers. All will need to learn to pursue their own objectives in
ways that move society as a whole forward.
Against this background, and with the World Summit for Sustainable Development
planned for 2002 in mind, nine of the world's largest mining companies
decided to initiate a project to examine the role of the minerals sector
in contributing to sustainable development, and how that contribution
could be increased.Through the World Business Council for Sustainable
Development, they contracted with the International Institute for Environment
and Development to undertake a two-year independent process of research
and consultation - the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project
(MMSD). The project ultimately attracted support from more than 40 commercial
and non-commercial sponsors. From April 2000, Project teams in London
and four key regions worked to meet four broad objectives:
- to assess the global mining and minerals sector in terms of the transition
to sustainable development,
- to identify how the services provided through the minerals supply
chain can be delivered in ways that support sustainable development,
- to propose key elements for improving the minerals system, and
- to build platforms of analysis and engagement for ongoing communication
and networking among all stakeholders in the sector.
The project was supervised by an independent Assurance Group of 25 experienced
individuals from different perspectives and regions who served as individuals
rather than representatives of any organizations.The group met eight times
to review progress and advise on future direction.The project management
maintained independence throughout the process.The main components of
the project are set out in Box ES-1.
Box ES-1. The MMSD Process
Regional Partnerships. The project
included four regional partnerships, each with its own governance
structure, research priorities, and process of consultation: Southern
Africa, South America, Australia, and North America.
National Projects. Through the regional
partnerships, or in some cases directly from the project centre,
MMSD organized national efforts in approximately 20 countries. In
some cases these were simply reconnaissance research reports; in
others they included more ambitious research and consultation processes.
Global Workshops. Some 700 people
from diverse backgrounds attended the 23 global workshops or expert
meetings that dealt with issues from the handling of large-volume
wastes and biodiversity to indigenous concerns, human rights, and
corruption.
Commissioned Research. Approximately
175 individual pieces of research were commissioned globally and
by the regional partners in the course of the project. Much of this
was discussed or debated at the workshops or consultation meetings.
Presentations, Communications, and Bulletins.
The MMSD staff presented emerging ideas to a wide variety of audiences
and asked for comment. The project posted key documents on its website
and received substantial communication in response. Over the course
of the project, 21 Project Bulletins were sent to a list of more
than 5000 people, updating them on project activities and asking
for ideas and feedback and comment on the draft report.
|
Read
the rest of the Executive Summary
Return to Mining News List
top of page
|
|